| |
IRRITABLE
BOWEL SYNDROME (IBS):
The role of food
intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome.
What is an IgG reaction?
When the immune system is challenged with something that it
mistakenly sees as SCARY (an ANTIGEN) one of two things can happen: There is either an IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITY
REACTION (ANAPHYLACTIC TYPE of ALLERGY aka IgE)
or a DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTION (INTOLERANCE TYPE aka IgG).
These SCARY ANTIGENS may be foods and they can cause the human body a
lot of distress. In the case of IBS, we
are usually dealing with IgG reactions.
Various foods can cause a very unhappy gut and lead to bloating, gas,
diarrhea alternating with constipation and nausea.
The question is which foods?
A number of laboratories are equipped to test for IgG
antibodies. Often panels of up to 96
foods are tested. This gives the patient
an opportunity to concretely see what they are reacting to:
Food elimination based on
IgG antibodies in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.
Most patients with IBS have attempted at least some form of dietary
modification, which in some cases can be very extreme. Conflicting
results have been reported using exclusion diets and this approach
also suffers from the limitation that it has to be empirical. Thus
potentially offending foods can only be identified after their
elimination and subsequent reintroduction. This time consuming
process would be much reduced if the offending foods could be
identified beforehand. Attempts to do this using IgE antibodies have
been disappointing but the results of this study suggest that
measuring IgG antibodies may be much more rewarding. The response to
the IgG based diet in our trial did not correlate with atopic
status, the prevalence of which was found to be no greater than that
occurring in the general population.
It is now well recognised that up to 70% of patients with IBS have
evidence of hypersensitivity of the rectum, which probably extends
to involve most of the gut in many individuals. It is possible that
this hypersensitivity renders patients more reactive to a low grade
inflammatory process which would not necessarily cause symptoms in a
normal individual. This would explain why excluding foods to which
patients have IgG antibodies might be particularly beneficial in IBS
despite the fact that these antibodies may also be present in the
general population. Indeed, if this mechanism is particularly
important in IBS, it might be anticipated that IgG food antibodies
would be relatively common in this condition, as was the case in our
study.
Many patients with IBS would prefer a dietary solution to their problem
rather than having to take medication, and the economic benefits of
this approach to health services are obvious. It is well known that
patients expend large sums of money on a variety of unsubstantiated
tests in a vain attempt to identify dietary intolerances. The
results of this study suggest that assay of IgG antibodies to food
may have a role in helping patients identify candidate foods for elimination
and is an approach that is worthy of further biomedical and clinical
research.
Gastroenterol
Clin North Am. 2005 Jun;34(2):247-55
Lea R, Whorwell PJ.
Medical Academic Department, Education and Research Centre, Wythenshawe
Hospital, Manchester
M23 9LT, United Kingdom.
Irritable bowel syndrome patients frequently believe that food intolerances are
to blame for many of their symptoms, although not uncommonly this is caused by
the nonspecific increase in gut motility that occurs with food ingestion.
Nevertheless, dietary manipulation may result in substantial improvement in IBS
symptomatology provided it is individualized to the particular patient. By
further understanding the mechanisms involved in dietary intolerance, it should
be possible to optimize the benefits of this approach to treatment.
Jill Shainhouse, ND
If you would like more information on
food sensitivities and effective treatment options for IBS please contact the clinic at 416-322-9980 | |